New study says non-contact infrared thermometers are not successful as Covid-19 screeners

Must read

How to disable and delete Samsung Pay from your Galaxy phone

When it comes to paying conveniently, Samsung Pay makes using your phone as a bank card an easy process; however, there may come...

How to Hack the Hidden Google Chrome Dinosaur Game

Most of us have seen the dreaded “No Internet” error message on Google Chrome. You can actually turn this screen into a fun,...

How to sideload any application on Hisense smart TVs

Televisions, streaming sticks, and set-top boxes with Android TV have access to millions of applications through the Google Play Store. However, there are...

What is Google Assistant Snapshot? How to use it

By: Tech Desk | New Delhi | Published: August 29, 2020 7:52:30 pm Snapshot is adding nearby restaurants feature based on user's preferences...
Bhawani Singh
I am a blogger who believes in delivering latest tech news from around the world to my viewers.

BALTIMORE: One of the most common symptoms of Covid-19 is being sick with fever, whereas a study by Johns Hopkins Medicine and the University of Maryland School of Medicine describes that temperature screening, primarily done with a non-contact infrared thermometer (NCIT) is not an effective strategy to staunch the spread of Covid-19 virus.
According to an editorial published in Open Forum Infectious Diseases, the online journal of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the first aspect of Covid-19 screening by the temperature that the researchers questioned was when the US Department of Health and Human Services and the US.
Centres for Disease Control and Prevention released guidelines for Americans to determine if they needed to seek medical attention for symptoms suggestive of infection with SARS-CoV-2, with temperature screening.
According to the guidelines, fever is defined as a temperature taken with an NCIT near the forehead — of greater than or equal to 100.4 degrees Fahrenheit (38.0 degrees Celsius) for non-healthcare settings and greater than or equal to 100.0 degrees Fahrenheit (37.8 degrees Celsius) for health care ones.
An author of the study, William Wright said, “Readings obtained with NCITs are influenced by numerous human, environmental and equipment variables, all of which can affect their accuracy, reproducibility and relationship with the measure closest to what could be called the ‘body temperature’ or the core temperature, or the temperature of blood in the pulmonary vein.”
“However, the only way to reliably take the core temperature requires catheterization of the pulmonary artery, which is neither safe nor practical as a screening test,” he said.
In their editorial, Wright and Mackowiak provided statistics to show that NCIT fails as a screening test for SARS-CoV-2 infection.
“As of Feb. 23, 2020, more than 46,000 travellers were screened with NCITs at US airports, and only one person was identified as having SARS-CoV-2,” told Wright.
From a November 2020 CDC report, Wright with his fellow co-author Philip Mackowiak provided further support for their concern about temperature screenings for Covid-19. The report, they said, stated that among approximately 766,000 travellers screened during the period Jan. 17 to Sept. 13, 2020, only one person per 85,000 — or about 0.001% — later tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Additionally, only 47 out of 278 people (17%) in that group with symptoms similar to SARS-CoV-2 had a measured temperature meeting the CDC criteria for fever.
Another problem with NCITs, Wright said, is that they may give misleading readings throughout the course of a fever that makes it difficult to determine when someone is actually feverish or not.
“During the period when a fever is rising, a rise in core temperature occurs that causes blood vessels near the skin’s surface to constrict and reduce the amount of heat they release,” Wright explained. “And during a fever drop, the opposite happens. So, basing fever detection on NCIT measurements that measure the heat radiating from the forehead may be totally off the mark,” he added.
Wright and Mackowiak concluded their editorial by saying that these and other factors affecting thermal screening with NCITs must be addressed to develop better programs for distinguishing people infected with SARS-CoV-2 from those who are not.
Concluding the editorial, they also suggested strategies for improvement like, (1) lowering the cutoff temperature used to identify symptomatic infected people, especially when screening those who are elderly or immunocompromised, (2) group testing to enable real-time surveillance and monitoring of the virus in a more manageable situation, (3) ‘smart’ thermometers i.e.wearable thermometers paired with GPS devices such as smartphones, and (4) monitoring sewage sludge for SARS-CoV-2.

Source link

More articles

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to our newsletter

To be updated with all the latest news, offers and special announcements.

- Advertisement -

Latest article

Get up to 58% off Tidal Premium or Tidal HiFi

Tidal is really giving Spotify a run for its money. After all, the service boasts a larger music library than its more famous...

PhonePe Surpasses Google Pay to Become Leading UPI App in December, NPCI Data Reveals

PhonePe, the digital payments platform owned by Walmart, has surpassed Google Pay and emerged as the top unified payments interface (UPI) app in...

One more FIR against Amazon Prime’s ‘Tandav’

Charges of disturbing communal peace raised against the cast and crew of the web series The Gautam Buddha Nagar police in Uttar Pradesh has...

After Adverse Reactions To Coronavirus Vaccine, Bharat Biotech Releases Factsheet On Who Should Take It

Can we do one thing right? Apparently not. The arrival of the Coronavirus vaccines attracted a lot of skepticism largely because...

Climate change: ‘Exceptionally hot’ 2020 concludes warmest decade

"Because we haven't stopped doing that and, in fact, we continue to do that even with the pandemic, we're still putting our foot...
- Advertisement -